USPTO serial 75525101
SNOOP DOGGY DOGG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOOP DOGGY DOGG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
PETER S SLOANE FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |