USPTO serial 75525211
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
IZMIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
IZMIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
IZMIR, TR
Other trademarks owned by EGE SERAMIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT1018 PRESTON STE 100HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Ceramic reservoirs, namely, ceramic toilets, toilet bowls, whirlpool baths, showers and faucets, toilet seats; ceramic water closets, ceramic urinals; ceramic bidets, ceramic bathtubs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Ceramic tiles, ceramic oriental style bathroom stone, granite ceramics, ceramic tiles for floor and wall coverings, edging, and bricks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Ceramic towel holders, ceramic toilet paper holders, ceramic sponge holders. | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |