USPTO serial 75525310
NU CLENZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2002
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NU CLENZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCHIOHOL AIRPORT 118BH, NL
Hoofddorp, NL
1118 BH Schiphol Airport, NL
1118 BH Schiphol Airport, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON R. PONTAOE
LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VALLEY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; detergents, decalcifying and descaling preparations; water softeners; laundry additives; all aforementioned goods with or without a disinfective component | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RECKITT BENCKISER N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by RECKITT BENCKISER N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named NU CLENZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |