USPTO serial 75525392
TRUTH OR DARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUTH OR DARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | board games and card games | ACTIVE | Aug 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 5, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |