USPTO serial 75525603
IDEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2663549Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- STRIEGEL, ADAM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reston, VA
ALEXANDRIA, VA
CHANTILLY, VA
Cabin John, MD
ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
DUBLIN 4, IE
Other trademarks owned by ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
CHANTILLY, VA
FAIRFAX, VA
FAIRFAX, VA
ALEXANDRIA, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Polly A. Dinkel
Polly A. Dinkel Sideman & Bancroft LLPOne Embarcadero Center, 22nd FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning security, security standards and policies, and efforts to maintain security in connection with the computer and electronic information infrastructure and the telecommunications infrastructure; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning security, security standards and policies, and efforts to maintain security in connection with the computer and electronic information infrastructure and the telecommunications infrastructure; providing information in the field of telecommunications, namely, the security of, and vulnerability to breaches and hacking of, the telecommunications infrastructure in the nature of electronic reports and threat alert notices via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1998 |
| 042 | security services, namely, security risk and threat management in the field of the security of, and vulnerability to breaches and hacking of, computer and electronic information infrastructure; and providing information in the field of the security of, and vulnerability to breaches and hacking of, computer and electronic information infrastructure in the nature of electronic reports and threat alert notices via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VERISIGN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDEFENSE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Infrastructure Forum, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by IDEFENSE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IDEFENSE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ID ACQUISITION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IDEFENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |