USPTO serial 75525626
SHAREDENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SELTZER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHAREDENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY L. COLLINS
WILLIAM W COCHRAN LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM W COCHRAN, LLCSTE 2303555 STANFORD RDFT COLLINS, CO 80525Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer software containing databases for development and computer-aided design of mechanical or electro-mechanical parts, products or components, and for the analysis, optimization, creation, visualization, simulation, revision and reproduction of mechanical or electro-mechanical parts, products or components used in product development and manufacturing; computer software enabling audio and video tele-conferences or global computer information network conferences; and devices for the storage or implementation of the above-mentioned computer software, in particular magnetic, electronic and optical data carriers and memory cards for development and computer aided design, creation and documentation of mechanical or electro-mechanical parts, products or components stored on electronic, magnetic or optical media and software for teaching computer aided design of metal parts, products and components stored on electronic, magnetic or optical media | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed material, namely, newsletters, periodicals, pamphlets, books, catalogs, articles, data sheets, product system application notes, technical bulletins, product and system operating and service manuals in the field of computer-aided design of metal parts, products and components; instruction manuals and books for teaching computer-aided design of metal parts, products and components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for others in the field of computer-aided design of mechanical and electro-mechanical parts, products and components; development and maintenance for others of computer programs and data bases for information and data processing; engineering services, namely, computer-aided design of mechanical and electro-mechanical parts, products and components to achieve the realization of customer specific solutions using a combination of system components; consultation and providing information regarding the use of software for computer aided designs of mechanical and electromechanical parts, products and components, including the drawing up of customer-specific solutions providing information regarding the use of software for computer aided designs of mechanical and electromechanical parts, products and components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hewlett-Packard Company
- Other trademarks owned by CoCreate Software GmbH & CO KG
- Other trademarks owned by Hewlett-Packard Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHAREDENGINEERING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |