Drawing for CONTROL FIRE SYSTEMS LTD.

USPTO serial 75525647

CONTROL FIRE SYSTEMS LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3038603Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CONTROL FIRE SYSTEMS LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES W MCKEE

Colleen F. Goss FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040RECYCLING OF HALONSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 6, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 11, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 19, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 30, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 6, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 10, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance