USPTO serial 75525736
DEVON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEVON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD JOSEPH
HOWARD JOSEPH LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD JOSEPH3200 BROADWAYCHICAGO, IL 60657UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely men's, women's and children's socks and hosiery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |