USPTO serial 75525970
NOVASOY THE POWER OF SOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOVASOY THE POWER OF SOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary E. Innis
MARY E INNIS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK ST STE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Soy extracts and isoflavones for use in the manufacture of food products and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |