USPTO serial 75526038
DRIVE-IN TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRIVE-IN TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID GARBER
LATERN LN ENTERTAINMENT INC22705 SPARROWDELLCALABASAS, CA 91302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | broadcasting cable satellite and broadcast television programs over television, satellite, audio and video media and over a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely, production and exhibition of cable, satellite and broadcast television programs for broadcast and distribution over television, satellite, audio and video media and a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LANTERN LANE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LANTERN LANE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DRIVE-IN TV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |