USPTO serial 75526485
KURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2001
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fridley, MN
Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fridley, MN
Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Fridley, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN M. KOEHLER
STEVEN M. KOEHLER Westman, Champlin, & Koehler, PA121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2328UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ MACHINE TOOL PALLETS, namely, REPLACEABLE SUPPORTS FOR HOLDING PARTS FOR MACHINING; ] POWER MACHINE TOOL DRAWBARS, namely, POWER DRIVED TO LOCK TOOLS INTO COLLETS ON POWER OPERATED MACHINE TOOLS; CARVING BLOCKS FOR VISES, namely, BLOCKS USED IN A VISE AND MADE OF SOFT MATERIAL THAT CAN BE SHAPED TO FIT A PARTICULAR PIECE PART; WORKHOLDING FIXTURES, namely, METAL CLAMPS USED FOR HOLDING PIECE PARTS ON MACHINE TOOL TABLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | METAL VISES, [ TOOL HOLDERS, ] METAL VISE JAWS, VISE WORKPIECE STOPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kurt Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named KURT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |