Drawing for INTEGRATED CONVERGENT SWITCH

USPTO serial 75526728

INTEGRATED CONVERGENT SWITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATED CONVERGENT SWITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER

SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS ET AL11911 FREEDOM DR STE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5645UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Carrier class, computer hardware and computer software, namely switching and tunneling computer hardware and computer software embedded in a chassis, sold to telecommunications carriers and network services providers, which enable the user to provide data and voice transmission services to customersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance