USPTO serial 75526847
ESI EXPRESS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029535Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESI EXPRESS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.WSuite #1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2005 |
| 042 | INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, IN-PERSON, E-MAIL AND TELEPHONE TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAINOR ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAINOR ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAINOR ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ESI EXPRESS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |