USPTO serial 75526873
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark V Muller
MARK V MULLER JENKENS & GILCHRIST1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in creating, managing and accessing databases reflecting consumer account activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized database management and data processing services concerning consumer account activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing an interactive database in the fields of insurance, banking, investments, bill paying and general financial business transactions concerning consumer account activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software for establishing and managing databases reflecting consumer account activity | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |