Drawing for TRANSFORMATION.ORG

USPTO serial 75526877

TRANSFORMATION.ORG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSFORMATION.ORG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Faye L. Mattson

FAYE L MATTSON CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT AND PRERECORDED CD-ROM DISKS AND PRERECORDED VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES IN THE FIELD OF BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATERIALS AND TUTORIALS, NAMELY, BOOKS, INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS, WORKBOOKS, EVALUATION FORMS, AND TESTS IN THE FIELD OF BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES RELATED TO BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTACTIVE—
042CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance