USPTO serial 75527016
XPEDX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XPEDX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Blum
RICHARD C STEWART II INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY6285 TRI-RIDGE BLVDLOVELAND, OH 45140UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FILM, NAMELY SENSITIZED PHOTOGRAPHIC, CHEMICALS, NAMELY PHOTOGRAPHIC CHEMICALS, PHOTOSENSITIVE PAPER, PHOTOGRAPHIC CHEMICAL WASHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | PRINTERS' INK | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | PRINTING PRESSES, PRINTING PLATES, PRINTING ROLLERS, ELECTRIC HAND HELD BOOK BINDERY TOOLS, NAMELY STITCHERS, COLLATORS, DRILLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SCANNERS, DIGITAL FILM OUTPUT DEVICE, NAMELY IMAGE SETTERS, COMPUTER WORK STATIONS, SERVERS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER TO PLATE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY DIGITAL TO PLATE OUTPUT DEVICE AND DIGITAL PROOFING, NAMELY EQUIPMENT FOR DIGITALLY COMPOSING A PROOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTING PAPER, PRINTERS' BLANKETS NOT OF TEXTILE | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE PRINTERS' BLANKETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Paper Company
- Other trademarks owned by International Paper Company
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named XPEDX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |