Drawing for TALL TREES

USPTO serial 75527121

TALL TREES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALL TREES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I MORLEY DRUCKER

I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION PROGRAM PRODUCTION SERVICESACTIVEJan 14, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 23, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 1, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 18, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 30, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance