USPTO serial 75527121
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I MORLEY DRUCKER
I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION PROGRAM PRODUCTION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |