USPTO serial 75527172
SUN TZU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUN TZU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C THOMAS SYLKE
GARY A ESSMANN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN AND SYSTEM INTEGRATION, SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON INFORMATION SECURITY, NAMELY, PROVIDING PROTECTION AND SECURITY FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION, INCLUDING NETWORK POLICY AND SECURITY ASSESSMENT, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACCESS CONTROL, ENCRYPTION, FIREWALL, SECURE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND VIRUS PROTECTION SYSTEMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN, NAMELY, DESIGN OF LOCAL AND WIDE AREA NETWORKS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK CONNECTIONS; DATA ARCHIVING, AND CONSULTATION RELATED TO ALL OF THE FOREGOING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |