USPTO serial 75527645
CONSUMPTIONCYCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONSUMPTIONCYCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATE R FITZ
KATE R FITZ SHEPPHARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON4 EMBARCADERO CTR LBBY 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, IDENTIFYING CONSUMER PATTERNS IN SHOPPING FOR, PURCHASING, TAKING DELIVERY OF AND USING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES PURCHASED ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN ORDER TO CREATE MAXIMUM WEB SITE FUNCTIONALITY AND PROFITABILITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND WEB-BASED CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPARISON OF CLIENT WEB SITES WITH OTHER GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORKS AND WEB-BASED BUSINESS MODELS AND RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS AND APPROACHES TO RE-DESIGN OF CLIENT WEB SITES; AND ASSOCIATED WEB CONSULTING SERVICES TO CREATE MAXIMUM WEB SITE FUNCTIONALITY AND PROFITABILITY FOR CLIENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |