USPTO serial 75527750
AMPLISCREEN TAQMAN HCV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMPLISCREEN TAQMAN HCV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. MICHAEL YOUNG
D MICHAEL YOUNG ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION9115 HAGUE RDINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256-1025UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named AMPLISCREEN TAQMAN HCV
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |