USPTO serial 75527831
MAXIM TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976337Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIM TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J Lipshutz
Barbara J Lipshutz Jacobs & Burleigh LLP445 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Television production, television programming, television show production and cable television programming | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |