USPTO serial 75527928
OPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sao Paulo, SP, BR
Sao Paulo, SP, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW P LYNCH
28720 ROADSIDE DRSTE 225AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301-4571Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Synthetic resin in pellets for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |