USPTO serial 75528019
CYCLOPS SOCKCLIP KEEP AN EYE ON YOUR SOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYCLOPS SOCKCLIP KEEP AN EYE ON YOUR SOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bretagne, MC
London SW3 5UH, GB
London SW3 5UH, GB
Bretagne, MC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P GILLY
RICHARD P GILLY WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR AND SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST 22ND FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2097UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Clothes pins, namely, plastic clips and clothes pegs to keep pairs of socks together, such as in washing or drying machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barclay, Duncan
- Other trademarks owned by Rodier, Alain
- Other trademarks owned by Rodier, Alain
- Other trademarks owned by Barclay, Duncan
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CYCLOPS SOCKCLIP KEEP AN EYE ON YOUR SOCKS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |