Drawing for CADET

USPTO serial 75528360

CADET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CADET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger D. Emerson

BRUCE E PEACOCK WEGMAN HESSLER & VANDERBURG6055 ROCKSIDE WOODS BLVD STE 200CLEVELAND, OH 44131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007lawnmowers and parts thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 15, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 15, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 15, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance