USPTO serial 75528445
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Winterset, Winter Haven, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT L ALLEN
HERBERT L ALLEN ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH ET ALPO BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | inspirational novelty products, namely, pens, business card holders, drawing rulers, drafting rulers, ungraduated rulers, paper clip holders, printed paper signs, letter openers, book covers, paper place mats, plastic place mats, sketch pads, greeting cards, gift wrapping paper, book marks, stationery, writing instruments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |