USPTO serial 75528459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J MICHAEL CLEARY
J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY KOMEN & LEWIS LLP600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4316UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Line of cosmetics consisting of foundation, lipstick, eye-liner, eyebrow pencils, mascara, eye shadow, lip liner, eye cream, and cleansing products for the face and body, namely, cleansing lotion, cleansing gel, liquid cleanser, makeup remover and cleansing lotions and gels in the form of facial masks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |