USPTO serial 75528485
CARDINAL BANK, N.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARDINAL BANK, N.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH M TENER
RALPH M TENER MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC11350 RANDOM HILLS RD 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |