Drawing for OPTEPAK

USPTO serial 75528630

OPTEPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTEPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTA S LEVINE

MARTA S LEVINE QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016recyclable paper and cardboard containers for the storage and transportation of goodsACTIVE—
020non-metal pallets and recyclable plastic containers used for the storage and transportation of goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance