Drawing for AIR ROUTING FLIGHT MANAGER

USPTO serial 75528800

AIR ROUTING FLIGHT MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIR ROUTING FLIGHT MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tim Headley

TIM HEADLEY HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP1000 LOUISIANA ST STE 4300HOUSTON, TX 77002-5012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for retrieving real time flight information, weather information, flight plans, customized weather maps, forecasts, observations, NOTAMS, PIREPS, AIREPS, SIGMETS, and historical data on products and services used, and for tracking product and services requests and billing information, all in the field of aviationACTIVEJan 15, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 16, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 24, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance