USPTO serial 75528800
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Headley
TIM HEADLEY HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP1000 LOUISIANA ST STE 4300HOUSTON, TX 77002-5012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for retrieving real time flight information, weather information, flight plans, customized weather maps, forecasts, observations, NOTAMS, PIREPS, AIREPS, SIGMETS, and historical data on products and services used, and for tracking product and services requests and billing information, all in the field of aviation | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |