USPTO serial 75528995
PLEASANT FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLEASANT FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norton R Townsley
100 CORPORATE POINTE STE 330CULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PRECOOKED VEGETARIAN FOODS, NAMELY, SOY-BASED IMITATION MEAT PATTIES MADE OF SOYBEAN POWDER, TEXTURED SOY PROTEIN AND VEGETABLES; PREPARED DINNERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SOY-BASED IMITATION MEAT PATTIES AND PROCESSED VEGETABLES SERVED WITH GRAINS AND SAUCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |