USPTO serial 75529102
LASERPATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LASERPATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hartwell, GA
LASER RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L6J 7J8, CA
Other trademarks owned by LASER RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PASSY, PHILIP W.
- Other trademarks owned by LASER RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named LASERPATH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |