USPTO serial 75529139
THE ANIMAL SHELF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ANIMAL SHELF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 3JG, GB
Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 3JG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN R GURSKY, ESQ.
STEVEN R GURSKY ESQ GURSKY & EDERER LLP1350 BROADWAY 11TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures and accessories therefore; action skill games; mechanical and electrical action toys; children's party games; amusement park rides; stuffed toy animals; arcade games; paddle ball games; beach balls; Christmas tree ornaments, namely, decorated balls and animals figures; snow sleds for recreational use; cases for carrying dolls; children's play cosmetics; doll costumes; dolls; crib toys; dart games; board games and card games for children; doll houses; doll house furniture and furnishings; footballs and soccer balls; action-type target games; equipment sold as a unit for playing action-type target games; bows and arrows; play sets for dolls; pop-up toys; puppets; plush toys; toy record players; rugby balls; playground equipment, namely, sandboxes; scuba diving equipment, namely, flippers, goggles, masks and snorkels; soft sculpture plush toys; squeezable squeaking toys; children's multiple activity toys; toy vehicles; toy weapons; exercise trampolines; transforming robotic toy vehicles; wind-up toys; and yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |