USPTO serial 75529155
SPHERIPOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPHERIPOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2132 MS Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET S. MILLIKIN
MARGARET S MILLIKINBASELL N AMERICA INC912 APPLETON RDELKTON, MD 21921Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | LICENSING IN THE PETROCHEMICAL AREA, NAMELY, LICENSING OF POLYOLEFIN POLYMERIZATION PROCESS TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS MADE THEREBY | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF POLYOLEFINS FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING AND POLYOLEFIN PROCESSING; TREATMENT OF POLYOLEFINS BY ADDIVATING, GRAFTING, AND/OR BRANCHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LABORATORY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW POLYOLEFIN PROCESS; LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF POLYOLEFINS; LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF THE TREATMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF POLYOLEFINS; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF POLYOLEFIN PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; TECHNICAL WRITING FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING ADVICE FOR LICENSEES IN THE NATURE OF OFFERING ADVICE IN POLYOLEFIN POLYMERIZATION AND WITH RESPECT TO POLYOLEFIN PRODUCTS PRODUCED THEREBY; TECHNICAL-ANALYTICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD POLYOLEFIN POLYMERIZATION AND POLYOLEFIN PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |