USPTO serial 75529194
LET IT RIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2605107Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LET IT RIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele L. McShane
Michele L. McShane SHFL entertainment, Inc.6650 El Camino RoadLegal DepartmentLas Vegas, NV 89118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | LOTTERY TICKETS AND GAME TICKETS FOR PLAYING INSTANT GAMES OF CHANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shuffle Master, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shuffle Master, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SHFL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Shuffle Master, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LET IT RIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |