Drawing for KISS SEASPA

USPTO serial 75529330

KISS SEASPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, KARLA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KISS SEASPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam Siegartel

Adam Siegartel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Pedicure products namely mineral foot soaks; foot masques; foot scrubs; callous treatment serum; massage oil; pedicure file and toe separatorsACTIVEFeb 9, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance