USPTO serial 75529350
AQUA-SLX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2001
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AQUA-SLX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marci A. Blazer, Richard F. Biribauer, Michael J. Ryan, Jr., Laurence S. Rickles, Rebecca B. Gibbs
MARCI A BLAZER JOHNSON & JOHNSONONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | coating sold as an integral component of medical catheters and guidewires | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 6, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |