Drawing for CONTINUOUS DUTY TOOLS

USPTO serial 75529956

CONTINUOUS DUTY TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTINUOUS DUTY TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jiri M. Mestecky

NANETTE M NORTON BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC CORDED AND CORDLESS POWER TOOLS AND BENCHTOP TOOLS, NAMELY, DRILLS, DRIVER DRILLS, CIRCULAR SAWS, RECIPROCATING SAWS, JIG SAWS, HOLE SAWS, BELT SANDERS, PAD SANDERS, RANDOM ORBITAL SANDERS, STUD PUNCHERS, NAILERS, GRINDERS, SHEARS, SCREW GUNS, CLINCHING TOOLS, AIR COMPRESSORS, DISC SANDERS, OSCILLATING BELT SANDERS, OSCILLATING SPINDLE SANDERS, BAND SAWS, MITER SAWS, CHOP SAWS, DRILL PRESSES, LATHESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 3, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 25, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 13, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 31, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance