USPTO serial 75529973
CARPRICES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2568518Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARPRICES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
Pacific Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Miller
Matthew R. Miller Miller Law Firm835 Fifth Ave.Suite 301San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing information relating to automotive prices, price quotes, car insurance, vehicle financing, vehicle leasing and vehicle warranties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1996 |
| 042 | Providing information relating to car quality, car performance reviews, car ratings, car features, and automobile news | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 7, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 10, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 7, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |