Drawing for BALTIMORE ATHENIANS WABASH OUTLAWS HARLEM SCHOLASTICS SPARTAN BRAVES SAVOY BIG FIVE

USPTO serial 75530022

BALTIMORE ATHENIANS WABASH OUTLAWS HARLEM SCHOLASTICS SPARTAN BRAVES SAVOY BIG FIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALTIMORE ATHENIANS WABASH OUTLAWS HARLEM SCHOLASTICS SPARTAN BRAVES SAVOY BIG FIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, hats, scarves, headbands, jackets, coats, tops, pants, socks, shoes, boots, slippers, sneakers, underwear, sleepwear, ties, bottoms, wristbands, sweatbands, hosiery, sweat shirts, sweat pants, T-shirts, swimwear, beachwear, dresses, jumpers, play suits, thermal underwear, jeans, jumpsuits, skirts, overalls, leggingsABANDONED—
035Proving information on retail items, namely, computer software, jewelry, prints and publications, sports bags and handbags, backpacks, mugs, glassware, bed linens, pillows and bed spreads, clothing, novelty pins and buttons, pennants, toys and sporting equipment, via the global computer network and on-line retail stores featuring computer software, jewelry, prints and publications, sports bags and handbags, backpacks, mugs, glassware, bed linens, pillows and bed spreads, clothing, novelty pins and buttons, pennants, toys and sporting equipment, via the global computer networkABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 6, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Jan 12, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance