Drawing for Serial No. 75530086

USPTO serial 75530086

Serial No. 75530086

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75530086?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard T. Lyon

RICHARD T LYON LYON HARR & DEFRANK LLP300 ESPLANADE DR STE 800OXNARD, CA 93030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication Services, namely domestic and international long distance telephone servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 2, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance