USPTO serial 75530190
NOTHING GROWS LIKE A FRESH IDEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOTHING GROWS LIKE A FRESH IDEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELLEY J SAFER
SHELLEY J SAFER LATHROP & CLARKP O BOX 1507MADISON, WI 53701-1507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications; namely, staff training manuals for use in the restaurant industry; brochures on the subject of group sales, franchise information, investors, potential landlords, and franchise expansion; and training materials, namely, books, pamphlets, and manuals featuring information regarding food service management practices, food and beverage service techniques, food handling and preparation skills, basics of customer satisfaction, food safety and sanitation, sales techniques in a restaurant environment, and use and maintenance of food services equipment, point of sale systems, and computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | franchising services; namely offering technical assistance in the establishment, operation and licensing of restaurants; and restaurant management services provided for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training services in the field of food service management practices, food and beverage service techniques, food handling and preparation skills, menu development, basics of customer satisfaction, food safety and sanitation, sales techniques in a restaurant environment, and use and maintenance of food services equipment, point of sale systems and computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | carry-out restaurant services; and restaurant consulting services provided for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richtree Markets Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Richtree Markets Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NOTHING GROWS LIKE A FRESH IDEA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |