USPTO serial 75530286
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERRY J. ELMAN
GERRY J. ELMAN Elman Technology Law, P.C.406 Yale AvenueP.O. Box 209Swarthmore, PA 19081| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | House mark for medical devices, namely, radiotherapy medical devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |