Drawing for Serial No. 75530319

USPTO serial 75530319

Serial No. 75530319

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 75530319?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN P CLANCY

WILLIAM R HANSEN DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017automotive products, namely polyethylene sheeting for the protection of vehicle upholstery and carpetingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 17, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance