Drawing for LAWYERS.COM

USPTO serial 75530795

LAWYERS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAWYERS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. PAUL WILLIAMSON

J PAUL WILLIAMSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2623UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing an online interactive database featuring information exchange in the fields of law, legal news and legal servicesACTIVEJul 30, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 16, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 3, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 3, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 18, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance