USPTO serial 75531161
MAXIMUM RESULTS - MINIMUM TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMUM RESULTS - MINIMUM TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Plantation, FL
Plantation, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINE P YATES
CHRISTINE P YATES TRIPP SCOTT PAP O BOX 14245FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing facilities for a timed physical fitness workout consisting of weight training and using cardiovascular equipment and weights | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |