USPTO serial 75531272
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW YORK, NY
Toronto, Ontario, M5R 3S4, CA
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Conyers
ROBERT M WASNOFSKI JR ESQ BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |