USPTO serial 75531355
NO RULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO RULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | STATIONERY, CALENDARS, GREETING CARDS, BUMPER STICKERS, DECALS, NOTEBOOKS, BINDERS, BINDERS AND FOLDERS FOR SCHOOL WORK, ADDRESS BOOKS, DAILY CALENDARS, DIARIES, COLORING BOOKS, COMIC BOOKS, PENS, PENCILS ERASERS, PENCIL CASES, PENCIL SHARPENERS AND NOTE CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by R & S Trading Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by R & S Trading Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 4190530 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NO RULES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |