USPTO serial 75531484
CELERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2891461Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CELERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCKVILLE, MD
Rockville, MD
ROCKVILLE, MD
ROCKVILLE, MD
ALAMEDA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J. McDevitt
David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD ROMS, compact discs, [ audio and video cassette tapes ] featuring the subject of science, technology, medicine, health and health-related business, [ law and public policy issues ] ; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of reports in the field of science, technology, medicine, health and health-related business [, law and public policy issues ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Celera Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CELERA GENOMICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CELERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CELERA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |