USPTO serial 75531485
CELERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2900036Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CELERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALAMEDA, CA
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
NORWALK, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consultation and research in the fields of science, technology; computer services, namely, providing databases and information in the fields of science, technology; [providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accessing and analyzing information in the fields of science, technology;] development of new products for others in the fields of science, technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 24, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Celera Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PE CORPORATION (NY)
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELERA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |