USPTO serial 75531508
MULTIMEDIA SHEETMUSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIMEDIA SHEETMUSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria M. Eliseeva
MARIA M ELISEEVA MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402-0938SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG WOESSNER & KLUTH PAP O BOX 2938MADISON, WI 53701-2719Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADED DIGITAL FILES WITH ENHANCED AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES FOR THE INTEGRATION, SYNCHRONIZATION, DISPLAY AND PRODUCTION OF TEXT, GRAPHICS, MUSIC, STILL AND MOVING IMAGES; SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR MANIPULATING THE DIGITAL FILES; TRANSFER OF SUCH FILES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND OPERATION OF SUCH FILES ON THE CLIENT'S SITE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |